<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skyscraper Collapse Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lgt2.com/limeblogbeta/2008/06/19/skyscraper-collapse-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lgt2.com/limeblogbeta/2008/06/19/skyscraper-collapse-thoughts/</link>
	<description>People watching for the eyes (video blog) and ears (podcast) from a gay, coffee drinking, graphic designing, living and watching guy in Chicago</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Buckstiegel</title>
		<link>http://www.lgt2.com/limeblogbeta/2008/06/19/skyscraper-collapse-thoughts/#comment-47081</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Buckstiegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lgt2.com/limeblogbeta/?p=100#comment-47081</guid>
		<description>Yes, well flying is a whole other issue with me, I'll save that for another video blog, haha. Gosh, I have some issues huh! Anyway, ironically I was just thinking, as I was looking at these building again during a walk, that something I was forgetting about was how far down they dig when building. I forget that is also part of the overall design of stability which does make thing a little more logical. That being said, some still look like they can easily snap off at the bottom! Thanks for your comments!

Kev!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, well flying is a whole other issue with me, I&#8217;ll save that for another video blog, haha. Gosh, I have some issues huh! Anyway, ironically I was just thinking, as I was looking at these building again during a walk, that something I was forgetting about was how far down they dig when building. I forget that is also part of the overall design of stability which does make thing a little more logical. That being said, some still look like they can easily snap off at the bottom! Thanks for your comments!</p>
<p>Kev!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.lgt2.com/limeblogbeta/2008/06/19/skyscraper-collapse-thoughts/#comment-47051</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 05:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lgt2.com/limeblogbeta/?p=100#comment-47051</guid>
		<description>I too am fascinated with tall buildings, having grown up in a small town in Wisconsin.  I haven't really had a problem worrying about them falling down, but I do have an unhealthy fear of flying and I think it's mostly because I constantly picture what it would be like if the engines just shut off and the plane fell, or a wing came off and we just spun and spun to the ground.  (that was an unnecessarily long run on sentence).  Anyway, as far as the construction, I think I heard somewhere that buildings are very wide and heavy underground and that's what helps keep them standing.  Hope that little tidbit helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am fascinated with tall buildings, having grown up in a small town in Wisconsin.  I haven&#8217;t really had a problem worrying about them falling down, but I do have an unhealthy fear of flying and I think it&#8217;s mostly because I constantly picture what it would be like if the engines just shut off and the plane fell, or a wing came off and we just spun and spun to the ground.  (that was an unnecessarily long run on sentence).  Anyway, as far as the construction, I think I heard somewhere that buildings are very wide and heavy underground and that&#8217;s what helps keep them standing.  Hope that little tidbit helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
